Lindy
Build a standing AI assistant that handles inbox triage, scheduling and CRM updates continuously, rather than a one-off automation you trigger by hand.
What it costs
| Tier | Price | For | Includes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plus | $29.99/month per user | Everyday, standard use of a single AI assistant. | 3,000 credits per user per month, Slack integration, 40+ built-in skills, meeting tools, inbox management, and computer-use capability. |
| Pro | $99.99/month per user | Users needing meaningfully more capacity than Plus. | 15,000 credits per user per month — roughly 5x the Plus allowance — with the same feature set. |
| Max | $199.99/month per user | Heavy workloads running multiple assistants or high-volume tasks. | 35,000 credits per user per month — roughly 12x the Plus allowance. |
| Enterprise | Custom pricing | Organisations with compliance requirements. | All Max features, plus HIPAA compliance with a signed BAA, shared usage with bonus credits, dedicated support, audit logs, and onboarding assistance. |
Read from Lindy's own pricing page on 25 Sep 2026. Vendors change prices without notice.
Where it breaks
Usage is billed in credits rather than a flat per-task price, and different actions (a computer-use task versus a simple inbox reply) consume credits at very different rates, which makes the monthly allowance hard to translate into 'how many tasks' before you've actually run some.
Browser-based builder for configuring "Lindies" — named AI agents that run on triggers (a new email, a calendar event, a schedule) rather than only responding to a chat prompt.
First entry in this reference. There is no previous check to compare it against.
Lindy’s framing is deliberately different from most automation tools: instead of building a single zap that fires once, you’re hiring an “employee” — a named AI agent that watches your inbox, calendar or CRM continuously and acts on triggers without you initiating each run. That’s the difference between Make or Zapier’s if-this-then-that model and what Lindy is going for.
In practice this looks like: a Lindy that reads every new email and drafts a reply, one that reschedules meetings when a conflict appears, one that updates a CRM record the moment a deal stage changes in a connected tool. You review and approve as much or as little as you want per Lindy — most teams start by watching every action closely and loosen oversight over time rather than trusting it unwatched from day one.
What the credits actually track
Credits are consumed unevenly: a simple text-based action (reading an email, sending a Slack message) costs relatively little, while anything involving computer-use — actually clicking through a web interface the way a human would — costs considerably more. A team planning to lean on the computer-use feature heavily should expect to outgrow the Plus tier faster than the “3,000 credits” number suggests on its own.
Against the alternatives
Against Make, the mental model is the real difference: Make is a visual workflow builder where you wire together explicit steps, while Lindy is closer to briefing an assistant in plain language and letting it figure out the steps. Make gives you more precise control over exactly what happens and when; Lindy gets something running faster but with less visibility into its internal logic. Teams with a technical operator on staff often prefer Make’s explicitness; teams without one often get further, faster, with Lindy.
Get Lindy
Buying the tool is not the hard part.
The ebook is about what to hand over, in what order, and how you find out when it goes wrong. One payment, no subscription.